• 8
  • 5
  • 1135

Nick Cave and the BadSeeds - Dig, Lazarus,Dig!!!

www.fasterlouder.com.au

The wild eyed preacher has returned to the pulpit. Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds new album Dig, Lazarus, Dig!!! has been sent down from high for us poor mortals to make of it what we will.

I rub my hands with expectation but wring them with dread at the same time. ‘Can he do it again?’ I always wonder. This time, after Nick Cave’s glorious dig at the musical oligarchs during last year’s ARIA Awards, it was even worse. Would rock royalty status finally bring him down? Was that award just a vicious conspiracy by Wolfmother and The Veronicas to do him in – a poison chalice, like one of Castro’s cigars?

Well it’s out – and it didn’t all go wrong. Dig, Lazarus, Dig!!! is a classic Nick Cave belter. Different from what’s come before in many ways, the album still maintains that towering Nick Cave standard. It has the dark puppeteer ballads that are quintessentially modern Nick Cave but it also has tracks that take you back to the early Bad Seed’s albums and even further. There is more rock and roll in his new album but there is also a couple of tracks that verge on danceable.

The title track immediately reinforces something about Nick Cave. Sure he’s a great musician, a great performer, sure he’s been one of the most influential musicians Australia has ever produced, but beyond that he is something few musicians are these days – he’s just a fucking great storyteller. This new album proves it again.

Each song is a novella in its own right. Each song creates vision, both dark and light. There are not many musicians that can hold up the hand of literary genius. Nick Cave, like Lou Reed, Bob Dylan and Leonard Cohen, like Joni Mitchell and Suzanne Vega, is probably closer than most. Nick Cave can tell a bloody good story.

Dig, Lazarus, Dig!!! is, in some ways, more mainstream – or at least digestible – than much of Nick Cave’s recent stuff. It’s more marketable perhaps because it has some rock and roll thrown in with those tortured, booming ballads.

Dig, Lazarus, Dig!!! is a tome of short, sharp literary and musical whippets. All in all, you’re on a thunderous rollercoaster ride with the high priest of some weird cult standing up in the front car, waving his bony arms about like a loony.

Social

  • Brian B
  • sarahanne
  • CureMe
  • libby
  • goatlady

Comments

www.fasterlouder.com.au arrow left
13245
huck

huck said on the 15th Mar, 2008

One commentator once said that with each album Nick Cave he would lose as many fans as he would gain (that's of course with exception to Murder Ballads which sucked on so many levels). But for me I have often quipped that the worst thing Nick Cave ever did for his career was to give up the smack. Since he did his work has lacked intensity, edginess and that earth-shaking chaos.

On listening to DLD I welcomed the absence of that friggin string section and a move away from the overly verbose and dreary ballads but still what was left wasn't moving.

What attracted me to Cave back in 1988 (and I used to be a massive fan) was that he was "out there!". He was breaking new ground musically. He was bazaar and intoxicating. He worked at his craft by researching old books and songs, got into the language, and created an authentic and brooding atmosphere.

However whatever atmoshere he now creates seems to be euphemized by the uninspired and seemingly disinterested Bad Seeds.

There seems to be a trend for those musicians who break in from being "way out": They either keep doing the same thing until it is tired and boring or they give up and become generic and bland. Cave has moved continuously toward the latter and his rock/dance beats emphasize my claim. As a Cave watcher of almost 20 years the flashes of his old form occasionally sprout but they never seem to bloom anymore. Whereas Grinderman was the best thing he's done in years it like DLD is more of the same just this time it was served up with mild garlic sauce instead of mild chilli.

huck

huck said on the 15th Mar, 2008

One commentator once said that with each album Nick Cave he would lose as many fans as he would gain (that's of course with exception to Murder Ballads which sucked on so many levels). But for me I have often quipped that the worst thing Nick Cave ever did for his career was to give up the smack. Since he did his work has lacked intensity, edginess and that earth-shaking chaos.

On listening to DLD I welcomed the absence of that friggin string section and a move away from the overly verbose and dreary ballads but still what was left wasn't moving.

What attracted me to Cave back in 1988 (and I used to be a massive fan) was that he was "out there!". He was breaking new ground musically. He was bazaar and intoxicating. He worked at his craft by researching old books and songs, got into the language, and created an authentic and brooding atmosphere.

However whatever atmoshere he now creates seems to be euphemized by the uninspired and seemingly disinterested Bad Seeds.

There seems to be a trend for those musicians who break in from being "way out": They either keep doing the same thing until it is tired and boring or they give up and become generic and bland. Cave has moved continuously toward the latter and his rock/dance beats emphasize my claim. As a Cave watcher of almost 20 years the flashes of his old form occasionally sprout but they never seem to bloom anymore. Whereas Grinderman was the best thing he's done in years it like DLD is more of the same just this time it was served up with mild garlic sauce instead of mild chilli.

huck

huck said on the 15th Mar, 2008

One commentator once said that with each album Nick Cave he would lose as many fans as he would gain (that's of course with exception to Murder Ballads which sucked on so many levels). But for me I have often quipped that the worst thing Nick Cave ever did for his career was to give up the smack. Since he did his work has lacked intensity, edginess and that earth-shaking chaos.

On listening to DLD I welcomed the absence of that friggin string section and a move away from the overly verbose and dreary ballads but still what was left wasn't moving.

What attracted me to Cave back in 1988 (and I used to be a massive fan) was that he was "out there!". He was breaking new ground musically. He was bazaar and intoxicating. He worked at his craft by researching old books and songs, got into the language, and created an authentic and brooding atmosphere.

However whatever atmoshere he now creates seems to be euphemized by the uninspired and seemingly disinterested Bad Seeds.

There seems to be a trend for those musicians who break in from being "way out": They either keep doing the same thing until it is tired and boring or they give up and become generic and bland. Cave has moved continuously toward the latter and his rock/dance beats emphasize my claim. As a Cave watcher of almost 20 years the flashes of his old form occasionally sprout but they never seem to bloom anymore. Whereas Grinderman was the best thing he's done in years it like DLD is more of the same just this time it was served up with mild garlic sauce instead of mild chilli.