Jack Nasty Face & Shake! @Spectrum, Sydney (08/11/08)

www.fasterlouder.com.au
  • 76
  • 3
  • 581

The night was off to a questionable start. There was a suspicious stench entering into the venue that I’d rather not think about. However, that was quickly forgotten in the grungy surrounds while listening to Sid Vicious sing Something Else over the speakers.

Soon enough, openers Atomicide began their set. A reviewer, in writing about their single TV Tried To Kill Me, supposed that they would be an exciting live act, but that was sadly not the case at this show. Perhaps the guys were just nervous, but I found their set lacklustre. They had some interesting ideas – such as having all three members share the vocal duties – but the sound is derivative of the New York Dolls without really adding anything new to the mix.

Second band L.U.S.T. were much more fun to watch. Swaggering onto the stage and looking like they took their fashion cues from Mötley Crüe, their energy and enthusiasm was contagious. Their stage presence brought everyone in the room to attention. Lead vocalist Mikey Stone was channelling Sebastian Bach as he strutted around in snakeskin pants, aviator sunnies and cowboy hat, while guitarist Ronnie Rocker seems determined to become the next Slash by way of face-melting guitar solos and copious amounts of head-banging. Their music was reminiscent of old school ‘80s rock – Å“n’ roll with the attitude to match, and they pulled it off with aplomb.

Next came the always impressive Sydneysiders Shake!. I have to confess that this is the third time that I’ve seen this band live, and they’ve never disappointed. Always delivering consistently dynamic performances, they had the entire room shaking from all the punters dancing. As their last headlining show before they head off to try their luck in the UK, Shake! gave their audience everything they had and then some.

Vocalist Sam Dillon cavorted all over the stage, playfully involving his band members in his antics as he demanded (and received) everyone’s attention. There was no mercy from guitarists Lee Edwards and Dan Pritchard, bombarding everyone with catchy melodies that you can’t help but dance to, while bassist Amanda Pross and drummer Tim Milner watched on in amusement. At the end, the crowd was left wanting more as Shake!’s electrifying set came to an end.

With Jack Nasty Face’s themed stage costumes, I expected a set that would end the night on a high note. Instead, I have to confess that I was left bored to tears. As visually interesting as it is to see frontman Jack Nasty prancing around onstage in his top hat and cane, the music left me cold. I wasn’t alone, as the intense attention the crowd had directed towards the stage during the two previous bands quickly dissipated. People began to talk amongst themselves instead of watching the show. It’s a shame, as it brought what had been a great night to a less-than-satisfying end.

  • poisoned_the_well
  • cherrybomb design
  • girlwiththeband

Comments

www.fasterlouder.com.au arrow left
18931
Booboo_Kittiefukk

Booboo_Kittiefukk said on the 14th Nov, 2008

Reviewers put themselves out there too - which is why these comment sections exist at the bottom of all reviews. If you can't take criticism of your review maybe you are in the wrong business.

Not sure how you think we are inciting bullying - we actually said in our post if you think we are shit then we want to hear it.....hardly the sentiment of a band that can't take criticism.

AHHH - Do mature people watch reality TV?

Yes, and I'm not begrudging your right to comment. I'm just wondering how the banners I have on my MySpace profile and the tv shows I choose to watch have any relevance to what I write.

You actually didn't criticise anything. You just started on with the personal attacks. Was my spelling bad? Was my grammar awful? Did I get one of my facts wrong?

Right. And posting the link to my personal MySpace profile was not just inviting your fans to follow the link and start shit with me? Right. You're deluded if you think that anyone will believe that your motives were completely innocent in doing that. I didn't care if you posted the link to the review itself, but posting the link to my personal profile was crossing the line and you know it.

And asking a bunch of your fans who actually like you to come on and tell you if any of your shows were shit or not? That's hardly inviting an unbiased opinion.

Again, the shows I watch have absolutely no bearing on my writing skills. Your actions have done nothing but prove how immature you are for starting this drama in the first place.

Booboo_Kittiefukk

Booboo_Kittiefukk said on the 14th Nov, 2008

[You being here alone, as part of the band, is what is saying you can't take the criticism. Not only that but you posted a link to her personal MySpace page. MySpace and FasterLouder are two different communities and that was crossing the line.

That is what makes you a bad sport in all of this.

She is open to criticism, but when it comes in the form of personal bashing, that is when it is not right. You've said you've not done that, but you have over and over again.

We're going to have to send you a flashlight for the hole you're digging yourself now I think...

This conversation is going no where now - I just cannot see your points - they're not making sense to me. Continuing this conversation would be controversial - that would mean I'm doing something right....right?


I have not attacked you personally. Only questioned the way you have reacted to "your first shit review in three years".

You're the one that's digging yourself in a hole in here. Especially since you started off in this thread not only personally attacking me, but also neglecting to reveal that you are, in fact, a member of the band that you are apparently defending. You misrepresented yourself by talking about how "Jack Nasty Face ripped it up that night " as if you were a fan. Had you said "we ripped it that night", then at least you wouldn't be accused of being a liar. No, you didn't straight out say that you weren't in the band, but you gave the impression that you were not in the band, even without saying anything explicitly, and that is lying. You didn't even admit to being part of the band until my friend caught you out.

You really should give up now. You don't have a leg to stand on. You don't like my review? Fair enough. But until you have some constructive criticism about what I wrote, you really should just shut up right now, cos you've humiliated yourself enough.

Booboo_Kittiefukk

Booboo_Kittiefukk said on the 15th Nov, 2008



I don't care if the banner is up there when I'm not even that into the band's music. I rarely if ever use my MySpace, and what I leave up there is my business. If people like you don't like it, well too fucking bad.

Everyone has different reactions to the same things. I was at The Butterfly Effect show at the Roundhouse recently, and found Trial Kennedy so boring that I almost fell asleep standing up while I thought The Butterfly Effect were amazing. The FL reviewer, whom I met that night, thought the exact opposite, and he was standing right next to me. So fine, you thought JNF were good. Fair enough. I didn't, and I'm not going to pretend otherwise just so as not to piss off a few people.

L.U.S.T. don't pretend to be original. They are clearly borrowing from a lot of 80s hair metal bands, and I'm not just talking about their wardrobe. I never said in the review that I thought their music was original. What I liked about them was that their performance was a lot of fun. It was exuberant, and all of them were putting everything they could into their performance and having a good time.

I have reviewed artists before whose music I don't like (eg Monique Brumby, Simple Plan), but I still give them positive reviews because I am writing a gig review and their performance was good.

Well I don't care if people don't agree with my review. That's their prerogative, and not everyone will agree on the same thing. However, I am entitled to my opinion and I am entitled to give it.

G eeed

G eeed said on the 17th Nov, 2008

Firstly, I would like to say that with a name like BOO BOO kittieFUKK , what do you expect . Its sounds like a loose, porn star on Crack .How could you possibly expect people to take you or your friend (with the band) seriously.????
You sound like a very superficial woman , who completely relies on mindless entertainment and much like most humans these days, repetitive behavioral patterns .
“cause if we have not heard it before , we don’t recognize it" .... Note sarcasm .
And as for Atomicide sounding like the NEW YORK DOLLS ...WHAT a joke.... You must be kind of musically illiterate ... If you think that Atomicide sounds anything like the New York Dolls. I suggest before giving yourself the title of 'Music reviewer ', you educate yourself on Australian Music and support your local scene.... America is not the only place in the Blooming world and not our home.
Atomicide had a strong set of songs and a unique sound, Unlike most rehashed shit of today, Not to mention they were as tight as a Nun's Kunt.
For a Good time Band, Jack nasty face put on a show.....and had the crowd moving and a Grooving. They had a fun vibe and are an incredibly talented set of musicians...

“I wasn’t alone, as the intense attention the crowd had directed towards the stage during the two previous bands quickly dissipated.” Your words

BULL SHIT!

I am not going to stoop so low as to bag out the other bands.
THEY DONT DESERVE IT. it’s a tough industry and they all need our praise..Good gig guys


You as a music reviewer should be able to reference your bands correctly to their obvious influences.
You as a music reviewer should be able to describe (in words) the type of music they are playing possibly even using descriptive words such as "Pumping rhythms”, "erratic melodies". After all it is the PUBLIC you are writing too not Dear Diary.
You as a Media entity, Should be able to tell a story with a UN BIASED (which one are you sleeping with?) opinion.

You as a music reviewer should be talking about the music....

I have been Privy to many reviews in my time and some not so good ....But to this date i have never read a more unintelligent, Biased and superficial (is my make-up ok) review..
I don’t know why faster louder allows you to write.....
I have not been educated, informed or ammused by this review
And if i could flag you as Spam , I would.....
"Freedom is a state of mind , Not a state of Grace"
Viva la Revolucion!

G eeed

G eeed said on the 17th Nov, 2008




As i said there is a way to describe a bands music and style and performance with out bagging them out . I thought reviews were meant to be informative of the band , its musical style, Its songs , its show and the vibe in the room (non -personal). Its a review of music , not your f***ing mood...

"I was left bored to tears. As visually interesting as it is to see frontman Jack Nasty prancing around onstage in his top hat and cane, the music left me cold. I wasn’t alone,..."
..............................................................................

She could have talked about the style of music and the fact that people were dancing to Jack Nasty Face ...
Or a simple ......"its not my cup of tea , but the Crowd loved it"

If i was someone reading this review , I would only know two things about the first and last act .
Atomicide -SOUNDS like New york dolls (completely inaccurate)
Jack Nasty Face - was boring and the singer wore a top hat ....

Sorry , to me it sounds like a fan ,writing a review about her favourite bands and mostly its not about the music , its about the way they pranced around on stage and what they wore.

I just generally think its a lame review about all of the bands.
They were all good strong capable acts/musicians, that deserved more than a superficial review, by a musically uneducated person....

I think Faster Louder is responsible for letting this out to the public...

She should be working for Dolly magazine.... I hope she was not paid for this.

G eeed

G eeed said on the 18th Nov, 2008

At no point has this ever been (for me ) about favouritism. Its not about weather i like the bands or not.
Its about the review .... and how uninformative, uneducational and Biased this review was.
Its about her dear diary writing style, her uneducated presumptions and her blatent favouritism.
Did you notice that she named all of the members from one of the support (SUPPORT) bands ....by full name ....
She did not name any of the members from the headlining act....or even describe what thier music sounded like ...

I feel like i'm at high school...

I know you are,
but what am i ...

"Haha, let them defend their shitty band on the internet. If they have to do that then it's clear that they have enough doubts over their worth as it is." dkos

Yeah ! dkos Lets all keep our opinions to ourselves .....Wouldn't that be a great society to live in ....Even better lets all judge each other on a purely superficial level...

all the bands were good , and all had different elements that made them good ....

If you cant write constructive comments ... Go Away!

"By the way, I had a listen to Atomicide and they were SHIT. They don't deserve to be compared to legends like the NYD."MorningAfterboy

i agree they should not be compared to these legends .....
the word SHIT is so descriptive WOW ! how intellegent...

Miss Kitty BOO BOO i know you don't care , But you should . as a public reviewer. What you voice to the public , should be well thought out and involve logical , educated opinions .. As we regress into becoming a uneducated, superficial , media based society , You have a responsibilty to your fellow humans....
I will value your opinions in a review , when they are well founded.

Music and art are one of the Largest forms of free communication between poeple. It has been the expression of Many revolutions.. It has been the saving grace for people at war , in war and after war. It challenges the soul and can make us cry ...It can warm the heart and heal the soul.
It is today a free form of expression . Lets keep it that way.

Peace!