• 7
  • 1
  • 1043
www.fasterlouder.com.au

Debate heats up aboutSplendour's proposed new site

Last month we reported that Splendour In The Grass was one step closer to returning to its spiritual home in Byron Bay when the New South Wales Department of Planning released a report recommending approval for three major events a year at the Yelgun site purchased by the festival’s owners back in 2006.

The report recommended crowds of 30,000, 25,000 and 15,000 for the three events over a maximum of 10 days in the first year and “approval be given down the track for events for up to 50,000 people if all key performance indicators are met.”

Now, the final stage is under-way with the NSW Public Assessment Commission holding its public hearing about the matter over the last two days at the Byron Bay Community Centre.

According to Byron’s local paper The Echo, emotions have been running high at the meetings, where 131 speakers have presented their cases for and against the development – including Bluesfest’s Peter Noble.

Noble spoke in favour of the proposal, however he also claimed that it is unfair that the North Byron Parklands had approval to operate 365 days a year when his Tyagarah site was limited to the five days of Bluesfest. The ABC reports that Noble has said he would be happy to host Splendour rather than have it set up a larger event at Yelgun: “”We can easily take up to 30,000 people, we have put in the parking and we have the camping areas already in existence.”

Concerns were also raised at the meeting about potential flooding at the new Yelgun site, with attendees being shown pictures of the site allegedly submerged after recent heavy rainfalls.

However, developers of the site claim that the photos shown at the meeting were “not of the North Byron Parklands site at all and they were not taken “last week”. We are fairly certain that they were taken during the 2005 floods.” They also report that “The northern part of the camping site did have probably 80 to 100mm on it. It lasted for about 12 hours then dissipated. We also knew about 48 hours beforehand that a flooding, a potential flooding event of this nature was on the cards.”

Today’s meeting, according to The Echo, was marred by a mass walk out from locals who oppose the site, and disagreed with a number of the speakers including Oceans Shores Community Association president Jan Mangleson, a former Byron Shire councillor, who sees the development as holding great economic and employment opportunities for the region.

A final decision regarding the site will be made by the Public Assessment Commission at the conclusion of the public hearing.

Social

  • craig123

Comments

www.fasterlouder.com.au arrow left
43474
craig123

craig123 said on the 6th Feb, 2012

I was speaking to a mate down south over the weekend and we got to discussing this - and some interesting things come to light -

(1) That photo shown in the media reports wasn't current, it is likely from the 2005 floods and not the most recent rains, not to mention the pic is about 2km away from the proposed site. Goes to show how much activists like to bend the facts sometimes. Apparently it's a creek that is well known to flood - (and the locals know it !) but doesn't impact the site at all ! So no need to pack a canoe this year !

(2) The echo apparently likes to make things up as well - it seems although Brandon Saul is involved with the festival he didn't speak at either public hearings ... goes to show how much the media can beat things up to meet reader's expectations !

(3) Finally i made a comment above about Noble, and I did some searching because I didn't want it to sound like I was banging on for no good reason - it appears Bluesfest agreed to the one festival per year as a condition to get early approval for the Tygrah site. So they did bow to Byron planning scheme just to get approval - irrespective of any other applications/events etc. (see here http://www.byronnews.com.au/story/2008/06/19/apn-blues-fest-da-seeks-approval-for-tyagarah/ and http://www.byronnews.com.au/story/2009/09/17/nobles-dream-bluesfest-site-now-reality/)
also I fail to see, and maybe I am just uneducated, how non-permanent infrastructure being trucked in every event is better than purpose built structures (ie Falls Festival) for the area. Truck movements must be significantly higher - so bigger impacts etc to the environment, more pollution ...

Seems pretty clear to me that the decision is far from known - and the media reports seem to be focusing only on the negative not the positive. Those docs on the PAC site certainly aren't things you can order from the back of a Weet Bix box ! And there are lots of positives in there !