• 21
  • 11
  • 1176
Image for Melbourne loves live music more than footy

Melbourne loves live musicmore than footy

A curious mix of reporters, rock pigs and politicians converged on Melbourne’s Tote Hotel yesterday to listen to Premiere Ted Baillieu announce the findings of the first ever official report on the Economic, social and cultural impact of live music in Victoria.

Baillieu assured everyone in attendance that this was “not the first time I’ve been to The Tote, but certainly the first time I’ve been in a suit and tie,” and went on to detail the findings of the study, which was commissioned by the Labor Government following the SLAM ( Save Live Music ) rally in 2010.

The report, which focused on performances in pubs, bars, nightclubs, cafes and restaurants, uncovered some interesting truths; none more so than the fact that last year approximately 5.4 million people attended performances at a live music venue throughout Victoria as compared to 4.3 million who attended AFL matches in the state.

Other findings in the report which can be viewed in full at the Arts Victoria website were:

Venues

Melbourne has more live music venues than any other Australian city – 370 hotels, bars, nightclubs and restaurants featuring live music.

600 venues throughout Victoria provide 3,000 live performances per week, which equates to about five performances per venue per week.

Performers

Victorian performers earn an average of $19,500 per year from live music performance, with 69% of that coming from venue based performance.

Audiences

41% of punters attend one gig or less a month, 40% attend two to three every month and 19% attend at least four gigs a month.

Economic Contribution

Live music in venues generated $501 million to the Victorian economy

There were approximately 5.4 million attendances at live performances in Victorian venues. This compares with 4.3 million attendances to AFL matches in 2010.

Social and Cultural Contribution

74% of venues surveyed regularly feature original bands and performers

The report goes a long way in providing hard data on the importance of live music in Victoria, and will be used to help shape policy on liquor licensing and , it is hoped, property rights and amenity issues in the future.

A key problem faced by many live venues in Australia right now is a lack of first amenity laws; that is, there is nothing protecting established venues from new residents and developers who lodge noise complaints with local councils, who in turn impose noise-restrictions.

While the report doesn’t make any recommendations regarding first amenity it is listed as challenge facing the live music community, and the findings go a long way in producing hard fact that will help assist policy making in this area.

Social

  • Blindbaby Bluez
  • ragdoll
  • themhumm
  • ThatDude123
  • melissadonato
  • HelloSailor
  • Shieldsy23
  • Clemzee
  • N_JohnsonX
  • grattan
  • neuroticwill

Comments

www.fasterlouder.com.au arrow left
40915
Braveheart81

Braveheart81 said on the 11th Aug, 2011

Interesting commentary from Kim Salmon:

[URL="http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/spare-a-dollar-for-the-maker-music-doesnt-play-itself-20110809-1ikri.html#ixzz1UcdR0wMT"]People like to blame digital technology for the ease of obtaining music free, doing its makers out of their income. Technology will always change things - it is said that some theatre organists committed suicide with the advent of the talkies. Maybe true, sadly, but there are still organists.

I blame attitudes.

''It must be wonderful doing what you love for a living,'' people often say to me.

Or, ''Put yourself in my shoes, I've got a business to run'', which is a common refrain to working musicians from those who don't want to pay much for their services. The attitude behind this remark is taken as some kind of given and perfectly acceptable.

Well, I am in your shoes, Mr Publican. I've also got a business to run. The business of paying the sound guy, fellow musos, transport, rent. I've walked more than a mile in your shoes and I'm still not where you are.

Another thing I've heard said too many times is ''Why don't you get a real job?'' as if it's too much fun to be a real job.

Others will tell you to treat your music like a hobby and if you get paid for it, that's the icing on the cake. This is a big part of the problem; in my view there are so many people who are prepared to treat it like a hobby, that the professional musician is undermined.


I read that article in SMH the other day and am really not sure that I agree with much of what she said.

I don't believe that the fact that people are willing to play music as a hobby for their own enjoyment undermines professional artists. It just means that if you want to be a professional artist and actually make a living out of it, you need to be good (or probably more accurately, popular).

I don't think for a second that just because someone wants to be a professional musician means they should be able to achieve that regardless of their talent.