• 84
  • 0
  • 1034
www.fasterlouder.com.au

Yves Klein Blue split official

Citing that old chestnut ‘creative differences’ Yves Klein Blue have posted a statement on Facebook to announce their breakup, which was in part caused by frontman Michael Tomlinson’s shift from Brisbane to Melbourne with his now ex-girlfriend Megan Washington.

Yves Klein Blue broke up because of creative differences some time in the second half of 2010, after 5 years together. We grew up and apart. We now live in different cities and pursue our respective vocations to our utmost capacity.

We leave behind 1 full length album and 2 EPs in the hope that you will remember us through that body of work. Thank you for singing along.

We remain hopeful for the future.

Check out the photos from the band’s final show at The Go Between Bridge Concert in June 2010.

Social

Nobody has hearted this, be the first!

Comments

www.fasterlouder.com.au arrow left
37469
tom_slater1

tom_slater1 said on the 1st Feb, 2011

Righto, making fun of me for wearing a cap is as useless and puzzling as making fun of Meg Washington for needing to wear glasses. What an impotent criticism to make of someone, that their eyesight is poor so they're obviously less great than you are.

Ultimately, the moral of the story here (for me) is like some people/don't like some people, but feeling some almighty urge to actively hate someone for the crime of making music that you don't like but other people do like only makes you look like a sad shadow dweller who is furious that the world doesn't agree with them. You know who thinks that way and has done anything of enduring worth? Nobody. That's the personality type of stalkers and serial killers.

As for journalistic integrity, grattan I know that you think that what you wrote is true because you heard people saying it in the toilets at Ding Dong or something, and that this website is only a half-step away from an online NW for a bunch of shy men that need a hug, but saying something that is not publicly recorded fact (or fact in any sense) is foolish and misleading. Even if it reads to you like you're joining the dots and revealing implied messages because you have special insight because you know some guy whose girlfriend used to go out with some guy who toured with the band once or because the incredible respect that comes with being a FasterLouder local news reporter imparts on you some special douchebag allowance, you can't go around saying shit like that.

(I know that there are plenty of girls on here too, but for the most part they seem to be nice, decently-adjusted people.)

Ultimately, who gives a shit about anything in this article. I don't. I just found it intensely annoying that this website doesn't even masquerade as a legitimate news source. Instead, it's content to be a relay station for press releases, rehashed-from-Pitchfork international news tidbits and lonely people talking bullshit.

Each to their own, I suppose.

therat

therat said on the 1st Feb, 2011

Righto, making fun of me for wearing a cap is as useless and puzzling as making fun of Meg Washington for needing to wear glasses. What an impotent criticism to make of someone, that their eyesight is poor so they're obviously less great than you are.

Ultimately, the moral of the story here (for me) is like some people/don't like some people, but feeling some almighty urge to actively hate someone for the crime of making music that you don't like but other people do like only makes you look like a sad shadow dweller who is furious that the world doesn't agree with them. You know who thinks that way and has done anything of enduring worth? Nobody. That's the personality type of stalkers and serial killers.

As for journalistic integrity, grattan I know that you think that what you wrote is true because you heard people saying it in the toilets at Ding Dong or something, and that this website is only a half-step away from an online NW for a bunch of shy men that need a hug, but saying something that is not publicly recorded fact (or fact in any sense) is foolish and misleading. Even if it reads to you like you're joining the dots and revealing implied messages because you have special insight because you know some guy whose girlfriend used to go out with some guy who toured with the band once or because the incredible respect that comes with being a FasterLouder local news reporter imparts on you some special douchebag allowance, you can't go around saying shit like that.

(I know that there are plenty of girls on here too, but for the most part they seem to be nice, decently-adjusted people.)

Ultimately, who gives a shit about anything in this article. I don't. I just found it intensely annoying that this website doesn't even masquerade as a legitimate news source. Instead, it's content to be a relay station for press releases, rehashed-from-Pitchfork international news tidbits and lonely people talking bullshit.

Each to their own, I suppose.

After reading the first two paragraphs I thought, hey, right on brother, then after that it turned into a mass abortion.

Braveheart81

Braveheart81 said on the 1st Feb, 2011









Righto, making fun of me for wearing a cap is as useless and puzzling as making fun of Meg Washington for needing to wear glasses. What an impotent criticism to make of someone, that their eyesight is poor so they're obviously less great than you are.

Ultimately, the moral of the story here (for me) is like some people/don't like some people, but feeling some almighty urge to actively hate someone for the crime of making music that you don't like but other people do like only makes you look like a sad shadow dweller who is furious that the world doesn't agree with them. You know who thinks that way and has done anything of enduring worth? Nobody. That's the personality type of stalkers and serial killers.

As for journalistic integrity, grattan I know that you think that what you wrote is true because you heard people saying it in the toilets at Ding Dong or something, and that this website is only a half-step away from an online NW for a bunch of shy men that need a hug, but saying something that is not publicly recorded fact (or fact in any sense) is foolish and misleading. Even if it reads to you like you're joining the dots and revealing implied messages because you have special insight because you know some guy whose girlfriend used to go out with some guy who toured with the band once or because the incredible respect that comes with being a FasterLouder local news reporter imparts on you some special douchebag allowance, you can't go around saying shit like that.

(I know that there are plenty of girls on here too, but for the most part they seem to be nice, decently-adjusted people.)

Ultimately, who gives a shit about anything in this article. I don't. I just found it intensely annoying that this website doesn't even masquerade as a legitimate news source. Instead, it's content to be a relay station for press releases, rehashed-from-Pitchfork international news tidbits and lonely people talking bullshit.

Each to their own, I suppose.

OK, my self-righteous invective aside, the first reason you shouldn't have said that is because the press release doesn't, and nor has anybody at any point, ever. I understand that you think the release implies that there were more reasons than expressly stated for the break-up, but if they don't say "we broke up in part because Michael moved to Melbourne etc etc", then you can't.

The second reason is that the press release actually doesn't say what you think it says. It says "we broke up because of creative differences, blah blah, we grew up and apart". All past tense. All reasons for the breakup. Usually when people say "we grew apart", they don't mean that they literally moved their bodies further away from each other. It's a figure of speech. It means that they are no longer close. We NOW live in different cities is a statement of present day. We LIVED in different cities would be a bit of a better crutch for you to lean on.

The third reason is that no-one has said it. I know that's the same as the first reason but you don't seem to get it. Unless you can explicitly point to some quote or part of the release that mentions any of your gossipy footnote, then you can't pass it of as news.





My Lord, so much bile. Ever noticed how hipsters love to call other people hipsters in a really nasty way? For example this Stefan Beck character. His profile pic is Lil Wayne, his sig quotes Scott Pilgrim (the comic of course, not the film), and he's publicly broadcasting that he's going to see Sufjan Stevens, Joanna Newsom, Laneway, Best Coast and Wavves. All great things, but all definitely marks of a hipster if I ever saw one. There's also the implicit attitude that one knows of more things than others, and that he appreciates music/art/film etc to a greater degree than most. Which, again, being a frequent poster on a music blog, Stefan has in spades.

Of course, the greatest signifier of a hipster is the act of calling someone else a hipster. That truly elevates a person - they know what you need to do to be a hipster, but they're far too subtle/knowledgable/tasteful to succumb. Sure, he does/listens to/enjoys exactly the same sort of stuff as a hipster does, but not to be cool, but because he truly appreciates it.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_rRFMexiNIyo/TEqJF_3RhEI/AAAAAAAAAFI/GtpNEn3w9tY/s1600/pot_kettle_black.jpg