Brian Molko upsets news.com.au

www.fasterlouder.com.au
  • 39
  • 25
  • 2469

There’s nothing like a minor ‘altercation’ to make news.com.au flushed with indignant excitement. The portal reported yesterday that its Soundwave photographer Helen Parker was “lashed out” at by Placebo frontman Brian Molko during the band’s set at the Sydney event.

Apparently the photographer was in fact filming the performance, which incited Molko to fling a couple of bottles (somewhat nonchalantly) at her.

While news.com.au has reported “it is common practice for accredited media to shoot bands from the photographer’s pit during their set”, it’s unclear from the article whether Parker had permission to film. Which, we imagine, is why Molko was not happy.

Check out the shocking incident below, then have a trawl through FasterLouder’s somewhat less-wet photo coverage from SYDNEY and BRISBANE.

  • mattchew
  • luckyberlin
  • redeyesandtears
  • carla9913
  • akirraboo
  • emstereo
  • AdelheidePhotography
  • toxikon
  • nickersno
  • amemt
  • kyza
  • asmithy_87
  • libby
  • Alexphotosite
  • madison_manson
  • digitaljunglist
  • Stuo
  • tyler07
  • snapcrackleROCK
  • ashryn
  • laenij
  • ThatDude123
  • craig123
  • sarahanne
  • ionecoe

Comments

www.fasterlouder.com.au arrow left
30654
FeedbackPhoto

FeedbackPhoto said on the 28th Feb, 2010

well i see your point, why should others profit off the band. but i'm very pro bootleg and i don't think people should sell their bootlegs. but it doesnt really matter because i'd never pay for it, i've always traded and never paid someone for them.

it's hardly professional really... view of singer only with a handheld, its not like there were tripods and pro mics and several cameras.

some of the best or only footage of bands from the 80's and 90's were bootlegged, some guy wanted to record his fav band so he did.

i concur that making a profit off it is wrong, but still. the only reason a band should lose their shit at it is if they were spending money to record that particular show for an upcoming dvd or something.... otherwise they should just deal with it.

if your an upencoming band and someone films you, it'd be flattering.... a band that considers itself too big and important and awesome to be filmed... well fuck that.


it isn't that, though. official photographers are only allowed to do that; take photos. and only during the first three songs, usually (nothing was different at soundwave by the looks of things); some festivals even only allow two. this song was near the end of the setlist, approx 3/4 of the through, and the photographer was filming (i'm assuming it was done on an slr, and would have been noticeable because slrs require you to do video while looking through the screen).

now, all this is covered by a contract that you have to sign before entering the event for the day and gaining your photo pit passes. a contract that you have to sign and (in my prior experience) verbally agree to. i'm not sure of the legal standing of it, but the photographer was breaking contract by being there at that time and by filming, not photographing.

molko was a bit of a dick throwing water at a camera (shits expensive, yo; but most high end stuff is weathersealed so there isn't really a problem there) and security should have been on their toes a bit more. but it doesn't mean that he was in the wrong; the photog wasn't meant to be there.