167
22
2461

About the Author

JackT

view my other 2304 articles

www.fasterlouder.com.au

Oasis will tour here in 2009

Thu 2nd Apr, 2009 in Local News

Thanks to the sleuthing of an FL member, we now know that Oasis have committed to visiting us on their current world circuit. The band famous for its brawling, badmouthing and occasional music-making has already been announced on the second line-up for Japan’s Fuji Rock Festival in July.

An interview with Noel Gallagher on Oasis fan-site StopCryingYourHeartOut.com has also revealed their plans for Australia. When asked what stops are still to come on their tour, brother Noel confirmed: “We’re definitely playing in Australia and Russia.”

We haven’t seen Oasis in these parts since their sell-out run of dates in 2005. Last year, they set aside the in-fighting to release Dig Out Your Soul; certainly one of the better post (What’s the Story) Morning Glory? efforts. As long as stage invaders are kept in check, we should be in for some rollicking, nostalgia-tinted shows.

Cheers to Lewie for the tip-off!

Comments

www.fasterlouder.com.au

arrow left

Add Another | View all the comments in forum »

22124

The Fool

The Fool said on the 4th Apr, 2009

you obviously weren't there in 95 when Morning Glory came out, when all that was on the radio was Boyz II Men, Marky Mark & The Funky Bunch and East 17... hearing those first strains of Champagne Supernova is fkin electrifying

Oasis put rock music back on centre stage and there are a sh*tload of bands around today that only got where they are coz of the path that Oasis cut for them

He was born in '92. Pay him no mind, he talks out of his ass

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 4th Apr, 2009

you obviously weren't there in 95 when Morning Glory came out, when all that was on the radio was Boyz II Men, Marky Mark & The Funky Bunch and East 17... hearing those first strains of Champagne Supernova is fkin electrifying

Oasis put rock music back on centre stage and there are a sh*tload of bands around today that only got where they are coz of the path that Oasis cut for them

Oh what, now they're some kind of saviours of rock? Come ON.

I'm actually quite surprised you'd never heard of the terminology before.

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 4th Apr, 2009

1990*

C'mon, if you're going to be condescending, at least get your facts right.

digitaljunglist

digitaljunglist said on the 4th Apr, 2009

so let me guess... you're into Jimmy Eat World and all that new-wave blow-wave shite?

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 4th Apr, 2009

Yeah, I like Jimmy Eat World a lot.
Couldn't really describe "blow-wave" to you, though.

dkos

dkos said on the 4th Apr, 2009

Oh what, now they're some kind of saviours of rock? Come ON.

I'm actually quite surprised you'd never heard of the terminology before.

They are closer to being the "saviours of rock" and are a far better band than R.E.M so therefore your argument is invalid.

1990*

C'mon, if you're going to be condescending, at least get your facts right.

Can I have a go at being condescending?

All your writing is incessant shit, and your "fanboyish nature" gets in the way of you being able to write a good review.

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 4th Apr, 2009

Well, no they're not, for starters.
And R.E.M. have absolutely nothing to do with what's happening here, so if anything's invailid, it's your input.

You can certainly try.

...Ahh well.
You gave it your best shot.

dkos

dkos said on the 4th Apr, 2009

Well, no they're not, for starters.
And R.E.M. have absolutely nothing to do with what's happening here, so if anything's invailid, it's your input.

You can certainly try.

...Ahh well.
You gave it your best shot.

Looks as though that texta finally made its way into your blood stream. Yes they are, for finishers.

R.E.M are another band who were releasing and recording music throughout the mid-90s, therefore they were more-or-less effected by the same context and surroundings that confronted Oasis upon their arrival in the music scene.

Sorry that I didn't live up to your expectations, I have more in the tank, but I might save them for a time when I am not listening to m83.

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 4th Apr, 2009

I still think you're clutching at straws trying to drag R.E.M. into this, and really do feel you're doing it just to spite me. But hey, it's your bag, evidently. More power to you.

digitaljunglist

digitaljunglist said on the 4th Apr, 2009

Yeah, I like Jimmy Eat World a lot.
Couldn't really describe "blow-wave" to you, though.

Oasis have got it all - the tunes, the attitude, the style, some of the world's best known songs. noel gallagher is a songwriting genius, i'd put him on the same family tree as lennon/mccartney

jimmy eat world are just a bunch of whinging emos

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 4th Apr, 2009

Wow, you're really showing your ignorance there.

Clarity and Bleed American are better than anything that Oasis have done as a whole since Morning Glory.

brittles

brittles said on the 4th Apr, 2009

This thread makes me

http://images.southparkstudios.com/media/images/306/306_panda_dance.gif

The Fool

The Fool said on the 4th Apr, 2009

This thread makes me wanna

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g151/Joreyheart/Family-Guy-Vomit.gif

Stefan Beck

Stefan Beck said on the 4th Apr, 2009

I lol'd pretty hard at whoever mentioned Urban Hymns as a great album.

digitaljunglist

digitaljunglist said on the 4th Apr, 2009

Wow, you're really showing your ignorance there.

Clarity and Bleed American are better than anything that Oasis have done as a whole since Morning Glory.

you've gotta be kidding

And anyway, you still can't say they are better albums than Morning Glory - my point still stands that Morning Glory shits on those albums.

I'd take The Verve, Radiohead, Oasis, Kasabian, The Prodigy any day over those laughably pathetic emo bands.. Jimmy Eat World, Fall Out Boy, My Chemical Romance.. bunch of lame-os that need to harden up

Lewie said on the 4th Apr, 2009

Whats everyones top 5 Oasis songs?

Mine would be

Live Forever
Supersonic
Some Might Say
Go Let It Out
Rock n Roll Star

I still think Oasis have had the best B sides on any band in the last 20 years. The B sides in the 90s were better than anything most bands have put out in the last few years.

Stefan Beck

Stefan Beck said on the 4th Apr, 2009

Yeah,man I agree.
Oasis material that wasn't good enough to make it onto their studio albums is much better than any other music produced worldwide in the last nine years.

Lewie said on the 4th Apr, 2009

Yeah,man I agree.
Oasis material that wasn't good enough to make it onto their studio albums is much better than any other music produced worldwide in the last nine years.

First of all i didnt all music. I said most bands and by that im talking about your Kaiser Chiefs, Razorlight, countless English indie bands etc etc bands that followed in the wake of Oasis.

And I think it stands true if you listen to the likes of acquiesce, Rocking Chair, Talk Tonight, Half The World Away, Headshrinker, Lets All Make Believe, Fade Away etc etc

Most of those are better than a fuckload of stuff put out by most bands these days.

One thing Noel has never been good at is picking what songs should go on albums. Still adds to the band. Three b sides on a the best of album is a pretty good indication that they have had some class b sides.

Lewie said on the 4th Apr, 2009

Actually make that 4 b sides on best off. Forgot bout the masterplan. Tune.

Napoleon Solo

Napoleon Solo said on the 4th Apr, 2009

If Oasis put a lot more effort and integrity into their music I am sure further success would be waiting for them just around the corner.

bhutos said on the 4th Apr, 2009

you obviously weren't there in 95 when Morning Glory came out, when all that was on the radio was Boyz II Men, Marky Mark & The Funky Bunch and East 17... hearing those first strains of Champagne Supernova is fkin electrifying

Oasis put rock music back on centre stage and there are a sh*tload of bands around today that only got where they are coz of the path that Oasis cut for them

If this is all you remember as being on the radio when Morning Glory came out it's no wonder you think it's the greatest album ever. Oasis were the commercial pop act your little sister liked and were one of the least rock things around. What was BDO '95? Ministry, Primal Scream, Magic Dirt, Silverchair..

Not saying they didn't have good pop songs and weren't iconic, but lets not misrepresent the situation. They might have blown the mind of someone who only ever watched Video Hits.. But every one else of formative age was either watching Recovery on the other channel or still asleep after being at some party that had Rage on the tv the night before.
It's also quite amusing to think Oasis cut a path for anyone considering how highly derivative they are.
In short.. good band, fit the times, deserves their place in history, but lay off the crack pipe.

I might add, Oasis came up in a large American forum about 6 months ago and it turned into a handful of Aussies and Poms explaining to the yanks who they even were. I don't for a second believe that in anyway affects the quality of the music involved, but it should give you a taste of how parochial the idea that they were the greatest thing ever was.

Lewie said on the 4th Apr, 2009

Oasis least rock things around??? Have you even listened to Def Maybe????

Oasis have never been cutting edge I admit that. They are innovative and Noel even admits this. They just play Rock n Roll. But you cant deny they were responsible for a lot of kids starting Rock n Roll bands in England. Have a look at all these English bands these days like the Arctic Monkeys and they all say shit like listening to def maybe made me want to pick up a guitar.

They are of reasonable size in America to. Could have been a lot bigger but they Liam Gallagher bailed on American tour at the height of there popularity in 96. Then when they played the MTV awards they generally didnt give a fuck, Liam spat on stage or something and pissed a lot of people. As Noel said in America if you want to get anywhere you got to suck a lot of dick and thats something they wont do. Still they sell out good venues like Madison Square Garderns etc so still doing well.

Anyway enough of this pointless arguing. I for one cant wait to see them.

Lewie said on the 4th Apr, 2009

Thats supposed to read not innovative above as well! Edit button is working for me.

mooney88

mooney88 said on the 4th Apr, 2009

why does MAB always put album names in italics?

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 4th Apr, 2009

Acquiesce
Cast No Shadow
Some Might Say
Champagne Supernova
The Importance of Being Idle (very overlooked song on an otherwise pretty dull record).

See?
I don't hate Oasis, I just don't care much about them anymore.

gumbuoy

gumbuoy said on the 4th Apr, 2009

Which has a capacity of 20 000, in a city of 20 million,

when it comes to venues, famous does not equal large...

Napoleon Solo

Napoleon Solo said on the 4th Apr, 2009

Acquiesce
Cast No Shadow
Some Might Say
Champagne Supernova
The Importance of Being Idle (very overlooked song on an otherwise pretty dull record).

See?
I don't hate Oasis, I just don't care much about them anymore.

Who really gives a fuck what band you have become bored with after downloading. You bring out the usual cliches with the news of Simon and Garfunkel touring but what exactly makes them so now? You would never have seen Oasis live so you are in no position to comment on their relevance at any given time. The fact that a Trial Kennedy show would hold more significance to you shows how much weight yourr opinion holds in this discussion.

andy_chalmers_102

andy_chalmers_102 said on the 4th Apr, 2009

While I do agree it's stupid to claim that Oasis don't have classic albums, or that they haven't had any major impact on a generation.. I think that with so many similar bands coming and going, as well as a pretty average last album, it's hard to argue that Oasis are still relevant.

Napoleon Solo

Napoleon Solo said on the 5th Apr, 2009

How does great music become irrelevant? Pearl Jam for me haven't had a decent album since No Code but that hasn't changed the impact of being at one of their shows and hearing Rearview Mirror being belted out.

digitaljunglist

digitaljunglist said on the 5th Apr, 2009

Oasis not relevant? That's like saying Pink Floyd's last album sucked so they are no longer relevant.

I think Oasis are more relevant than ever. In an age when songs called "umberella -ella -ella eh ehhh" outsell most rock acts 50 to 1, I for one thank fuck Noel picked up a guitar and wrote Live Forever and stirred up something in British youth and inspired the next generation to make music. Arctic monkeys owe them a debt, kasabian worship them, Doves and The Verve too, klaxons. even The Killers started as an oasis covers band

Oasis were the commercial pop act your little sister liked and were one of the least rock things around. What was BDO '95? Ministry, Primal Scream, Magic Dirt, Silverchair..

Bahahahahaa oasis were the pop and and silverchair was real rock. bollox. Young Modern over Definitely Maybe anybody? Daniel 'where's my makeup' Johns -v- Liam Gallagher?

Napoleon Solo

Napoleon Solo said on the 5th Apr, 2009

Digitaljunglist I disagree with what your saying almost as much as what MAB is saying.

Stefan Beck

Stefan Beck said on the 5th Apr, 2009

Oh c'mon.

Is "Umbrella-ella-ella-eh-eh" really anymore ridiculous than "Mayyyybbbeeeee you're gonna be the one who savvvessssss meeeeeeeee,cuz after all you're my wonderwaaaaaaaalllllllllllllll"?

The answer is: no

andy_chalmers_102

andy_chalmers_102 said on the 5th Apr, 2009

Oasis not relevant? That's like saying Pink Floyd's last album sucked so they are no longer relevant.

I think Oasis are more relevant than ever. In an age when songs called "umberella -ella -ella eh ehhh" outsell most rock acts 50 to 1, I for one thank fuck Noel picked up a guitar and wrote Live Forever and stirred up something in British youth and inspired the next generation to make music. Arctic monkeys owe them a debt, kasabian worship them, Doves and The Verve too, klaxons. even The Killers started as an oasis covers band

Bahahahahaa oasis were the pop and and silverchair was real rock. bollox. Young Modern over Definitely Maybe anybody? Daniel 'where's my makeup' Johns -v- Liam Gallagher?
Of course all those bands owe Oasis a lot, but that's like saying Mozart is still relevant today because he influenced a lot of today's classical composers. Obviously Oasis are an amazing band that will probably go down in history, and I'm sure a lot of people will go to their gigs and leave satisfied, but for me, hearing a band play half a set of timeless songs and half a set of bollocks from their new album just doesn't cut it.

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 5th Apr, 2009

Simple. The music of Simon and Garfunkel is timeless.
They actually have classic songs and albums. Oasis just think that everything they do is classic.

Young Modern didn't come out in 1995, genius.
A little album called Frogstomp did, however, and in that case? Oasis are definitely the pop band.

saimagizzle said on the 5th Apr, 2009

Wow, what a thread.

Oasis aren't the best band in the world, but they did have a significant cultural impact in the UK with Definitely Maybe and What's The Story, however, the biggest impact they had was during their britpop war with Blur. How do I know this? I lived in the UK in the mid-late 90's, so uh, I was getting that shit firsthand. In fact, I think I have Y'Know What I Mean on vinyl somewhere...

I dig them, I'll try and go see them, probably.

dkos

dkos said on the 5th Apr, 2009

Simple. The music of Simon and Garfunkel is timeless.
They actually have classic songs and albums. Oasis just think that everything they do is classic.

Your opinion is not fact. Please stop pretending like it is.

For the record, I don't like Simon & Garfunkel or Oasis.

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 5th Apr, 2009

All I'm doing is stating my opinion, Tom.
That's what we're all doing.

dkos

dkos said on the 5th Apr, 2009

All I'm doing is stating my opinion, Tom.
That's what we're all doing.

That's all well and good, but you say your opinion as though it is fact.

"It's quite Simple. I think that The music of Simon and Garfunkel is timeless.
They actually have classic songs and albums, in my opinion."

Stefan Beck

Stefan Beck said on the 5th Apr, 2009

Didn't Blur beat Oasis in the Blur/Oasis single war?

Country House versus...some Oasis song.

dkos

dkos said on the 5th Apr, 2009

Didn't Blur beat Oasis in the Blur/Oasis single war?

Country House versus...some Oasis song.

Who cares, according to the Book of MAB neither are relevant anymore.

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 5th Apr, 2009

That's all well and good, but you say your opinion as though it is fact.

"It's quite Simple. I think that The music of Simon and Garfunkel is timeless.
They actually have classic songs and albums, in my opinion."

Fill in the blanks, love; I'm not speaking from anyone else's perspective.
Besides, as if you do that every single time you have an opinion.

Didn't Blur beat Oasis in the Blur/Oasis single war?

Country House versus...some Oasis song.

I think you're right, Steven.
The Oasis song, I believe, was Some Might Say.

dkos

dkos said on the 5th Apr, 2009

Fill in the blanks, love; I'm not speaking from anyone else's perspective.
Besides, as if you do that every single time you have an opinion.

I don't do that, your right. But then again, I don't sit here and try and argue about the trivialities of Oasis' music when I quite clearly don't care about them.

And please, do not call me "love", that is fucking creepy as.

Stefan Beck

Stefan Beck said on the 5th Apr, 2009

Would it be less creepy if I said it Dkos?

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 5th Apr, 2009

I'm obviously only in it for the digitaljunglist quotes.

dkos

dkos said on the 5th Apr, 2009

Quite definitely, I would feel your tongue firmly in my cheek...

Wait. What?

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 5th Apr, 2009

gumbuoy

gumbuoy said on the 5th Apr, 2009

even The Killers started as an oasis covers band

Citation needed.

Yeah we're talking 1995 SIlverchair, not 2008 SIlverchair. If you're going to make a point, at least try to talk sense...

Lewie said on the 5th Apr, 2009

The Oasis single in the single was Roll With It not Some Might Say. Why Oasis released Roll With It as first single from Morning Glory ill never know. The difference between the two albums was shown when Morning Glory was out selling ten times the Blur album, which from memory was The Great Escape.

Blur are great though.

andy_chalmers_102

andy_chalmers_102 said on the 5th Apr, 2009

Blur are great though.

In your opinion.

and mine. :)

bhutos said on the 5th Apr, 2009

Bahahahahaa oasis were the pop and and silverchair was real rock. bollox. Young Modern over Definitely Maybe anybody? Daniel 'where's my makeup' Johns -v- Liam Gallagher?

hmm.. I seem to remember them fighting blur for the crown of "kings of"... what was it again?? sounds like "flitbop".. on the tip of my tongue... it's what the music was defined as... grithop?

Comparing an evolved '08 album to a '95 one "anybody"? Oh ZING! you so proved a point there. I don't know what exactly.. but you seem to think it's a relevant to the discussion somehow.

Just wait.. Were you even old enough to be going to gigs and whatnot back then? That might explain a few things, such as your wholesale ignorance. I mean hey, 1989-91 weren't some of the most pivotal years in rock history spawning a whole new guitar based movement or anything... No.. half a decade after alternative rock has a space on the shelves claim that brit popsters were the one's to rediscover guitars lol.

unlachs

unlachs said on the 5th Apr, 2009

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vy1ueZf1WMQ]the mike flower pops were pretty sweet

mooney88

mooney88 said on the 5th Apr, 2009

digitaljunglist

digitaljunglist said on the 6th Apr, 2009

all you people just get jealous of oasis's succes because in two short years they achieved more and wrote more great songs than most bands do in a lifetime

the funniest part is that in 500 years, my great, great, great... grandchildren will walk into a music store and there in the 1900-2000 section, alongside Sgt Peppers, Dark Side of the Moon and OK Computer will be a copy of Morning Glory.

The great dustbin of history will take care of silverchair and all your other favourite bands :)

mooney88

mooney88 said on the 6th Apr, 2009

all you people just get jealous of oasis's succes because in two short years they achieved more and wrote more great songs than most bands do in a lifetime

the funniest part is that in 500 years, my great, great, great... grandchildren will walk into a music store and there in the 1900-2000 section, alongside Sgt Peppers, Dark Side of the Moon and OK Computer will be a copy of Morning Glory.

The great dustbin of history will take care of silverchair and all your other favourite bands :)okay that was stupid

lak lak

lak lak said on the 6th Apr, 2009

but fantastic to read

Napoleon Solo

Napoleon Solo said on the 6th Apr, 2009

Oasis will never write an album even half as good as Morning Glory or Definitely Maybe, that can be agreed upon. Those albums have been at the top of many lists in the print media. If Oasis had broken up for 8 years then reformed today you wouldn't hear assclowns calling them irrelevant. The brothers Galagher managed to keep it together and still continue to make albums, that is a feat in itself.

Stefan Beck

Stefan Beck said on the 6th Apr, 2009

the funniest part is that in 500 years, my great, great, great... grandchildren will walk into a music store and there in the 1900-2000 section, alongside Sgt Peppers, Dark Side of the Moon and OK Computer will be a copy of Morning Glory.

Man,seriously.

Settle down.

You like Oasis,we get it.
Don't be ridiculous.

gumbuoy

gumbuoy said on the 6th Apr, 2009

all you people just get jealous of oasis's succes because in two short years they achieved more and wrote more great songs than most bands do in a lifetime

the funniest part is that in 500 years, my great, great, great... grandchildren will walk into a music store and there in the 1900-2000 section, alongside Sgt Peppers, Dark Side of the Moon and OK Computer will be a copy of Morning Glory.

The great dustbin of history will take care of silverchair and all your other favourite bands :)

Dude, come on, are you not watching the world at all?

I reckon music stores have got a remaining lifespan of about 10 years, tops, before they buckle under the weight of 100% digital distribution.

and even if they dont, when was the last time you wandered into a music store, and went to the "1500-1600" section?

Braveheart81

Braveheart81 said on the 7th Apr, 2009

Simple. The music of Simon and Garfunkel is timeless.
They actually have classic songs and albums. Oasis just think that everything they do is classic.

Young Modern didn't come out in 1995, genius.
A little album called Frogstomp did, however, and in that case? Oasis are definitely the pop band.

all you people just get jealous of oasis's succes because in two short years they achieved more and wrote more great songs than most bands do in a lifetime

the funniest part is that in 500 years, my great, great, great... grandchildren will walk into a music store and there in the 1900-2000 section, alongside Sgt Peppers, Dark Side of the Moon and OK Computer will be a copy of Morning Glory.

The great dustbin of history will take care of silverchair and all your other favourite bands :)

Is it just me or is there a similarity in the way these two grossly exaggerate their opinion as fact?

Stefan Beck

Stefan Beck said on the 7th Apr, 2009

Good point.

Can't think about it now though.
I'm off to my local record shop to look for something from the 1600-1700 section.

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 7th Apr, 2009

It's just you, Will.
All I'm doing is stating my opinion; I don't need to add "in my opinion" to the end of everything.

Napoleon Solo

Napoleon Solo said on the 7th Apr, 2009

Napoleon Solo

Napoleon Solo said on the 7th Apr, 2009

Stop using everyone's firstname Davey, you are coming off like a prat.

Braveheart81

Braveheart81 said on the 7th Apr, 2009

Good point.

Can't think about it now though.
I'm off to my local record shop to look for something from the 1600-1700 section.

I recommend Boogie Down Baroque Style

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 7th Apr, 2009

Shall I refer to you as Mr. Blonde, Mr. Pink etc?

Braveheart81

Braveheart81 said on the 7th Apr, 2009

Stefan, Braveheart (or Melmo if you must), and Napoleon do jjust fine.

They have avatars and screen names on the internet for a reason.

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 7th Apr, 2009

Oh come on. Your actual name shouldn't be offensive.

I'll still call you Melmo occasionally, and Chrissie will always get Snips. But I really don't see a problem calling you Will if you are, indeed, Will.

Napoleon Solo

Napoleon Solo said on the 7th Apr, 2009

Use quotes if you want.

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 7th Apr, 2009

Oh and Stefan = Steven. It's not that big a jump.

Napoleon Solo

Napoleon Solo said on the 7th Apr, 2009

Oh come on. Your actual name shouldn't be offensive.

I'll still call you Melmo occasionally, and Chrissie will always get Snips. But I really don't see a problem calling you Will if you are, indeed, Will.

Not everyone knows who Will is, it is just pointless. If I wanted the FL world to know me as Ben my user name would be YouCanCallMeBen_69.

Stefan Beck

Stefan Beck said on the 7th Apr, 2009

My name is Jamal you racist cracka.

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 7th Apr, 2009

Will knows who Will is, and you know who you are.
If the post is addressed to you, then you can respond accordingly.

I don't mind being called David or Dave or even "Davey" (though I've never really gotten that).

And the whole anonymous thing doesn't really work on here; it's kind of an everybody-knows-everyone forum, I've noticed.

gumbuoy

gumbuoy said on the 7th Apr, 2009

Thats not a CLASSIC album from that period, why would he buy it?

Cpt_Pugwash

Cpt_Pugwash said on the 7th Apr, 2009

MAB wtf is up with this first name shit, it looks weird and sounds weird

Is the internet MAAANNNN anonymous MMAANNNNN

Stefan Beck

Stefan Beck said on the 7th Apr, 2009

Shut up Clarence.

gumbuoy

gumbuoy said on the 7th Apr, 2009

And Clarence lives at home with both parents?

The Fool

The Fool said on the 7th Apr, 2009

I've spoken to him about this too.

Davey, it's an unattractive quality.

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 7th Apr, 2009

So is saying BDO 2010 all the time; doesn't stop you.

The Fool

The Fool said on the 7th Apr, 2009

Maybe I should change my username to YouCanCallMeAl

http://onemansblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/you-can-call-me-al.jpg

The Fool

The Fool said on the 7th Apr, 2009

At least I know I'm being annoying. You haven't quite worked that bit out yet

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 7th Apr, 2009

No, I've worked out that you know you're being annoying pretty easily.

Napoleon Solo

Napoleon Solo said on the 7th Apr, 2009

I think the point would be that the foolish one is deliberately annoying, not naturally.

Lewie said on the 7th Apr, 2009

Rumours of a tour announcement floating about now, wouldnt be suprised if something is announced in the next week.

eileenblue said on the 3rd Jul, 2009

just wonder why there hasn't been any dates announced yet

sarahanne

sarahanne said on the 3rd Jul, 2009

because of you and your selfish first posts.

think about it

think

think

ok

im done

ThatDude123

ThatDude123 said on the 4th Jul, 2009

what a long week it has been, then...

Lewie said on the 7th Jul, 2009

Yeah i'm suprised we have not heard anything yet... cant be to far away you would think. The longer they go unannounced the better the slim chance that they are doing BDO is.

I rekon they might get at least two tunes in hottest 100 of all time.

oldgregg

oldgregg said on the 16th Jul, 2009

i'm hoping itll be september/october. i'm going to england december/january, my favourite band by far. what does everybody else think?

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 16th Jul, 2009

Well, we spent about three pages talking about what we think; why not have a gander at that?

The Fool

The Fool said on the 16th Jul, 2009

Because who the fuck can be bothered reading 3 pages of tripe?

Anyway, I have the inside scoop. They'll be here in the '09. First cunt to argue with me gets stabbed.

oldgregg

oldgregg said on the 16th Jul, 2009

thanks fool. and i did read the other three pages, they weren't very helpful.

oldgregg

oldgregg said on the 16th Jul, 2009

lol when in 09!?

MorningAfterboy

MorningAfterboy said on the 16th Jul, 2009

I'm willing to bet that every regular here has collectively read through at least twenty pages of the stuff.

Jose Cuervo

Jose Cuervo said on the 16th Jul, 2009

Because who the fuck can be bothered reading 3 pages of tripe?

Anyway, I have the inside scoop. They'll be here in the '09. First cunt to argue with me gets stabbed.

BDO 2010?

oldgregg

oldgregg said on the 16th Jul, 2009

i dont see bdo happening.

but either way it doesn't matter. i'm basing my overseas trip on bdo. do you think melbourne will be around aus day again?

mxpx439

mxpx439 said on the 21st Jul, 2009

Lewie said on the 25th Jul, 2009

Liam Gallagher in a twitter update said Oasis are coming to Australia and a couple of other countries at the end of the year.

Fuck yes.

oldgregg

oldgregg said on the 25th Jul, 2009

fucking gay i will hang myself if they are here between dec 22 and jan 22.

Stefan Beck

Stefan Beck said on the 25th Jul, 2009

Lure them earlier by promising a look at your mangina.

oldgregg

oldgregg said on the 25th Jul, 2009

mmm crack open a fresh baileys

There are 66 more comments. View them all